A633.9.3.RB - Polyarchy Reflections?
A633.9.3.RB - Polyarchy Reflections?
The rise of polyarchy as a leadership practice does not
necessarily mean that oligarchy is redundant. In fact, one of the main
objectives of an organization should be how to deal with the existence of
polyarchy in oligarchy and hierarchy structure. (Obolensky, 2010) The main issue with
our leadership development is an issue of not being able to put managers that
can lead effectively in positions that can promote polyarchy style leadership
within organizations. This is a common issue with organization today.
The
assumption that leadership is done by a few leaders over many followers
(oligarchy) is the wrong assumption and a good example of why you should never
assume. This is a classic example of the old and outdated Theory X and
scientific management models including command and control, dictatorship,
authority and numbers metrics task focus. The only organization that resembles
this today is the military. For most organizations today, this is the model and
path for failure. The implication is that it doesn't work anymore. It doesn't work
and isn't people and process focused. This is also an example of
"pull" using old outdated and ineffective techniques. Why? Today's
highly competitive business environment, global economy, technology,
competition and constant change has changed business forever. Most successful
organizations today use some form of a team process, e.g., self-directed and
high performance.
I do not think that the new assumptions of polyarchy make the
old models of oligarchy redundant. I believe that the new model of
polyarchy has given us a greater understanding that leadership can be
accomplished by more than just a select few. Basically we can take this
knowledge of the oligarchy and modify it to the current times of leadership and
the recognition that leaders are not limited in their abilities and can be
trained and educated.
For me, I have always been under the impression that leaders
are born and not made. My views have changed very much on this. Yes,
many leaders are born, but I also strongly believe that leaders can be
built. In comparison to my past views, adaptive leadership involves the
understanding that being a great leader takes determination, ambition and the
willingness to learn in the field. With the proper knowledge, strong
coaching and the aid of a strong mentoring relationship a successful leadership and followership is possible.
Works Cited
Obolensky, N. (2010). Complex Adaptive Leadership:
Embracing Paradox and Uncertainty. In N. Obolensky, Complex Adaptive
Leadership: Embracing Paradox and Uncertainty (pp. 104-129). New York:
Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Comments
Post a Comment